- Posts: 118
COMMUNITY FORUM
About 1.6 and K2's future
- Alan Sparkes
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
15 years 2 weeks ago #75463
by Alan Sparkes
About 1.6 and K2's future was created by Alan Sparkes
Interesting article here.
sankuru.biz/en/blog/8-joomla-configuration-issues/52-k2-21-versus-joomla-16-alpha-in-svn.html
Oooh I love the future
sankuru.biz/en/blog/8-joomla-configuration-issues/52-k2-21-versus-joomla-16-alpha-in-svn.html
Oooh I love the future
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- olsen
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Joomla and K2 Freelancer
15 years 2 weeks ago #75464
by olsen
Didn't solve your issues?? Why dont you consider hire me? Email me or contact me www.xevedigital.com for details
Replied by olsen on topic About 1.6 and K2's future
Nice article. About the future of K2 against Joomla 1.6 I also have my doubts. Anyway, and if we consider that J1.6 its under development, and probably, far to be under stable release, K2 its by now IMO a good component to manage joomla content.
After all, if we have a look to the comparison chart on the article above, we have that K2 has all or more features by itself than joomla 1.6 will ever have( at least on beta releases).
After all, if we have a look to the comparison chart on the article above, we have that K2 has all or more features by itself than joomla 1.6 will ever have( at least on beta releases).
Didn't solve your issues?? Why dont you consider hire me? Email me or contact me www.xevedigital.com for details
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Alan Sparkes
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 118
15 years 2 weeks ago #75465
by Alan Sparkes
Replied by Alan Sparkes on topic About 1.6 and K2's future
Mmm
I was hoping that 1.6 will have the gear underneath to expan com_contents xml but i dont think it will. Annoying thing about K2's CCK is that you can only have one group of fields per category and these are looped thru in an array which makes it hard to seperate individual elements into a template - at least at first glance.....
olsen said:Nice article. About the future of K2 against Joomla 1.6 I also have my doubts. Anyway, and if we consider that J1.6 its under development, and probably, far to be under stable release, K2 its by now IMO a good component to manage joomla content. After all, if we have a look to the comparison chart on the article above, we have that K2 has all or more features by itself than joomla 1.6 will ever have( at least on beta releases).
I was hoping that 1.6 will have the gear underneath to expan com_contents xml but i dont think it will. Annoying thing about K2's CCK is that you can only have one group of fields per category and these are looped thru in an array which makes it hard to seperate individual elements into a template - at least at first glance.....
olsen said:Nice article. About the future of K2 against Joomla 1.6 I also have my doubts. Anyway, and if we consider that J1.6 its under development, and probably, far to be under stable release, K2 its by now IMO a good component to manage joomla content. After all, if we have a look to the comparison chart on the article above, we have that K2 has all or more features by itself than joomla 1.6 will ever have( at least on beta releases).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- d3vlabs
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 31
14 years 6 months ago #75466
by d3vlabs
Replied by d3vlabs on topic About 1.6 and K2's future
according to "JoomlaWorks" guy who posted at the link above (sankuru.biz/en/blog/8-joomla-configuration-issues/52-k2-21-versus-joomla-16-alpha-in-svn.html) K2 will have 100% integration with Joomla 1.6 ACL. If that's true I have no worries. I'd like to add. A lot of template clubs picked up on K2 including names like RocketTheme and Gavick, so K2 is always considered when i start a new project. Good to see optimism coming from the developers regarding the Joomla 1.6 release. Now lets just wait for the RC :)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.