My first post here, so let me start by thanking the developers of K2 for the excellent work they have done so far! After having worked with K2 for about a month now, I can safely conclude that K2 is a marvelous piece of software that really suits my needs!Having said that, I feel there is one little flaw in the way K2 handles attachments, so I would like to make a suggestion that you might consider for the next release.Contrary to pictures and picture galleries, attachments don't get their own sub-directory under /media/k2/attachments. This not only makes things a little harder to maintain on the long run, it also has a nasty side-effect that attachments need to be unique by name across all items (or am I missing something here?).Any chance this could be changed in the next release?Thanks.Marcel