- Posts: 83
COMMUNITY FORUM
very poor quality for K2 image...!
- piet
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
8 years 7 months ago - 8 years 7 months ago #153636
by piet
very poor quality for K2 image...! was created by piet
Hello,
it is strange but I can't find any thread about the jpg quality on the forum.
So the quality of the K2 image is very poor. We upload a 60% quality compression jpeg file in the image tab (in K2 article), but the image generated by k2 is very very poor and bad...
So what can we do to fix it, and increase image quality ?
Thank you.
Regard
See my screenshot:
it is strange but I can't find any thread about the jpg quality on the forum.
So the quality of the K2 image is very poor. We upload a 60% quality compression jpeg file in the image tab (in K2 article), but the image generated by k2 is very very poor and bad...
So what can we do to fix it, and increase image quality ?
Thank you.
Regard
See my screenshot:
Last edit: 8 years 7 months ago by piet.
The topic has been locked.
- JoomlaWorks Support Team
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Posts: 169
8 years 7 months ago #153638
by JoomlaWorks Support Team
JoomlaWorks Support Team
---
Please search the forum before posting a new topic :)
Replied by JoomlaWorks Support Team on topic very poor quality for K2 image...!
Hi,
At the parameters settings of K2 at Images tab you can set the quality of the jpg images. This field is labeled Quality (%) used when processing images
At the parameters settings of K2 at Images tab you can set the quality of the jpg images. This field is labeled Quality (%) used when processing images
JoomlaWorks Support Team
---
Please search the forum before posting a new topic :)
The topic has been locked.
- piet
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 83
8 years 7 months ago - 8 years 7 months ago #153655
by piet
Replied by piet on topic very poor quality for K2 image...!
yes, but the problem is that the parameters is set to 70%, and deliver a image in poor quality...
But you can see below the image from K2 (at 70% !!)
and second same image at 60% compression from photoshop (wich is really really better)
prefjugies4-k2-compression.jpg - 20.9 Ko
prefjugies4-photoshop.jpg - 39.3 Ko
So why is it happening ?
Regard.
But you can see below the image from K2 (at 70% !!)
and second same image at 60% compression from photoshop (wich is really really better)
prefjugies4-k2-compression.jpg - 20.9 Ko
prefjugies4-photoshop.jpg - 39.3 Ko
So why is it happening ?
Regard.
Last edit: 8 years 7 months ago by piet.
The topic has been locked.
- JoomlaWorks Support Team
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Posts: 169
8 years 7 months ago #153680
by JoomlaWorks Support Team
JoomlaWorks Support Team
---
Please search the forum before posting a new topic :)
Replied by JoomlaWorks Support Team on topic very poor quality for K2 image...!
Did you try to upload the image without compression from photoshop ?
JoomlaWorks Support Team
---
Please search the forum before posting a new topic :)
The topic has been locked.
- piet
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 83
8 years 7 months ago - 8 years 7 months ago #153689
by piet
Replied by piet on topic very poor quality for K2 image...!
Last edit: 8 years 7 months ago by piet.
The topic has been locked.
- Krikor Boghossian
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 15920
8 years 7 months ago #153707
by Krikor Boghossian
JoomlaWorks Support Team
---
Please search the forum before posting a new topic :)
Replied by Krikor Boghossian on topic very poor quality for K2 image...!
Hello,
PHP processing has its limits, the GD library needs a value of 80 - 85% to produce high quality images.
If you are using logos where image processing is not needed, you can swap K2's image with an extrafield.
PHP processing has its limits, the GD library needs a value of 80 - 85% to produce high quality images.
If you are using logos where image processing is not needed, you can swap K2's image with an extrafield.
JoomlaWorks Support Team
---
Please search the forum before posting a new topic :)
The topic has been locked.
- piet
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 83
8 years 7 months ago - 8 years 7 months ago #153716
by piet
Replied by piet on topic very poor quality for K2 image...!
Sorry I don't understand your answer :-(
You say that
(2) and so the solution is to put minimum 80% in the parameter ?
I made some test. 90% appears to be good.
(3) for the tests, is there a way to simply renew the images in the cache ?
If I deleted the cache, the image disappears from the article. So I need to reintroduce image in each article (an image'll be "reingenerate")...!
(4.1) when you said
(4.2) how can I swap image with extrafiled ? And why swapping images (what is the interest) ?
Sorry but I need to understand to fix the problem.
Thank you very much.
Regard.
You say that
(1) What is the GD library ?the GD library need 80-85%
(2) and so the solution is to put minimum 80% in the parameter ?
I made some test. 90% appears to be good.
(3) for the tests, is there a way to simply renew the images in the cache ?
If I deleted the cache, the image disappears from the article. So I need to reintroduce image in each article (an image'll be "reingenerate")...!
(4.1) when you said
Using logo where image image processing....? Which logo ? I don't use logo..just images here.If you are using logos where image processing is not needed, you can swap K2's image with an extrafield.
(4.2) how can I swap image with extrafiled ? And why swapping images (what is the interest) ?
Sorry but I need to understand to fix the problem.
Thank you very much.
Regard.
Last edit: 8 years 7 months ago by piet.
The topic has been locked.
- JoomlaWorks Support Team
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Posts: 169
8 years 7 months ago #153719
by JoomlaWorks Support Team
JoomlaWorks Support Team
---
Please search the forum before posting a new topic :)
Replied by JoomlaWorks Support Team on topic very poor quality for K2 image...!
Krikor means to set the Quality (%) used when processing images option to a value of 80% or greater. Mind also the values you have enter at option fields Item xx image width (in px) in relation with the original image size of the uploaded file.
JoomlaWorks Support Team
---
Please search the forum before posting a new topic :)
The topic has been locked.
- piet
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 83
8 years 7 months ago #153750
by piet
Replied by piet on topic very poor quality for K2 image...!
@Krikor
Can you, please, answer to our questions ?
Thank you very much.
Regard.
Can you, please, answer to our questions ?
Thank you very much.
Regard.
The topic has been locked.
- piet
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Premium Member
Less
More
- Posts: 83
8 years 6 months ago - 8 years 6 months ago #153772
by piet
Replied by piet on topic very poor quality for K2 image...!
Last edit: 8 years 6 months ago by piet.
The topic has been locked.