Krikor wrote: @Florian, @Yannis It is still on private dev.
It is still in our priorities and I can reassure you we are suffering from any issues.

You are or you are not ?

HAhahah no :)

We are not. I am also editing my post.
Thanks for pointing this out.

Could you give more information please.

In this topic you have said that it is in private dev and you say there are no issues but we are 6 months over the dates you gave when you stated it was close to completion with a few more tweaks.

These statements don't seem to make any sense.

Are you starting from scratch, have you hit coding issues, are you tied up with other client work or is there some other reason.

I can understand people getting frustrated when there seems to be no information and then the only information is 'everything is ok, it is in private dev' when this does not seem to sit with previous communications. Someone somewhere must have decided to put the release back for some reason, the community just want to understand what is happening and why then we might understand what is happening.

I'm not trying to be negative and I would love to be able to subscribe to a commercial subscription if it would help get the project finished (and I'm sure others would) but if you leave it much longer I'm not sure how many of the current/old user base will be left.

Looking forward to any explanation.

Cheers,

Dave

K2 3.0 is written completely in different code structure. So whosoever is using K2 2.6.9 with custom template would have to re-design the whole template when K2 3.0 final release. New project developers are feeling confusion in their mind whether they wait for K2 3.0 or build the project with 2.6.9.

The templates that you are using will be compatible with 3.0 if they are up to date.

I cannot however tell you anything about template frameworks or 3rd party extensions.

Now @inblackflag the complete code restructuring is mostly for the backend. Users with existing K2 sites will be able to upload. Since K2 is used by thousands of users Backwards Compatibility is a priority.

@Dave Sage Thank you for feedback. A longer statement is indeed needed. You are right. I personally cannot share any info but expect a detailed explenation/ blog post soon about this.

Actually I was thinking, what is the advantage to add k2 to Joomla 3.4.1?

The new Joomla version contains most of thing that k2 offered in the past, perhaps this is the most important thing that we should disscus

Thanking you in advance.

Extrafields, which is a huge asset.
Templating.
Commenting system out of the box.
Galleries and videos in your template and not inside your editor.
Proper tagging (no point in tagging your users or categories.)
User's page
A dozen of option so you can create multiple subtemplates and views.
Optimal Performance

These are just to name a few :)

For all this we don't want the project to be dropped :)

Your lack of communication and your inability to keep promises leaves me/us speechless!
You are not even able to keep a simple promise such as writing a post on your blog to explain the reasons for this delay!

How is this story going to end?

All Quiet on the "K2" Front ...